Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)
Which laptop is better: Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) or Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)?
Detailed testing and specifications comparison indicates that the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) offers superior processing power, utilizing an NVIDIA RTX 5090 (Laptop) (synthetic score of 32000) compared to the Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) with its NVIDIA RTX 4050 (Laptop). Ultimately, we rate the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) as the superior choice overall, grading at 9.1/10 for gaming capabilities, cooling, and structural build.
| Metric | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graphics Card (GPU) | NVIDIA RTX 4050 (Laptop) | NVIDIA RTX 5090 (Laptop) | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) |
| Graphics Speed Rating | 12,000 | 32,000 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) |
| Retail Price | $3,999 | $3,899 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) |
| Overall Rating | 8.8/10 | 9.1/10 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) |
📝 Technical Comparison Analysis
Which gaming laptop is faster: Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) or Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)?
Performance comparison and graphics testing
Direct Verdict: The Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) is faster for high-end gaming than the Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022). In graphics speed testing, the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)'s NVIDIA RTX 5090 (Laptop) graphics card outperforms the Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022)'s NVIDIA RTX 4050 (Laptop) by approximately 167%, yielding significantly smoother frame rates in demanding games.
How do the internal hardware specifications compare?
Pure configuration breakdown and direct hardware measurements
Direct Verdict: Both systems utilize similar memory, but the Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) delivers 175W Max (150W + 25W Dynamic Boost) graphics card power limits compared to the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)'s 175W Max (with Dynamic Boost) graphics power configuration, which directly affects gaming smoothness under heavy use.
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) |
|---|---|
| Brand | Brand |
| Graphics Card (GPU) | Graphics Card (GPU) |
| Graphics Card Power Limit (TGP) | Graphics Card Power Limit (TGP) |
| Graphics Memory (VRAM) | Graphics Memory (VRAM) |
| Main Processor (CPU) | Main Processor (CPU) |
| System Memory (RAM) | System Memory (RAM) |
| Storage Space (SSD) | Storage Space (SSD) |
| Screen Size | Screen Size |
| Screen Sharpness (Resolution) | Screen Sharpness (Resolution) |
| Refresh Rate (Smoothness) | Refresh Rate (Smoothness) |
| Screen Technology (Panel) | Screen Technology (Panel) |
| Color Range (Accuracy) | Color Range (Accuracy) |
| Screen Brightness | Screen Brightness |
| Weight | Weight |
| Body Materials | Body Materials |
| Plugs & Ports | Plugs & Ports |
| Wi-Fi & Wireless | Wi-Fi & Wireless |
| Keyboard Design | Keyboard Design |
Benchmark Duel: Which laptop delivers higher FPS in demanding AAA games?
Tested frame rates and real-world gaming performance comparisons
Direct Verdict: Tested frame rates show that the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) has a 167% performance edge in GPU-demanding titles.
| Game Title / Settings | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Cyberpunk 2077 (Ultra, Ray Tracing Ultra, DLSS Quality) | 65 FPS | 74 FPS 🏆 |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla (Ultra High) | 94 FPS 🏆 | 68 FPS |
| Borderlands 3 (Badass Preset) | 98 FPS 🏆 | 82 FPS |
| Forza Horizon 5 (Extreme Preset) | 110 FPS | 122 FPS 🏆 |
Methodology Notes: Tested under 22°C ambient temperature. Turbo performance preset active. MUX Switch set to discrete GPU mode. Values represent average FPS followed by 1% low FPS in brackets.
Frame rate Performance Narrative:
Which has better cooling under sustained load: Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) or Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)?
Cooling performance and heat control under heavy use
Direct Verdict: The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) runs cooler under gaming load, sustaining a CPU temperature of 82°C compared to the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)'s CPU load temperature of 84°C. This means a lower risk of slowing down due to overheating (25% risk for Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) vs 25% risk for Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)).
Custom vapor chamber covering 48.8% of the motherboard, featuring Conductonaut Extreme liquid metal on both CPU and GPU, exhausted by four 0.1mm copper fin heatsinks.
Asus's aggressive thermal design pays off. The vapor chamber and dual liquid metal application allow the system to push 230W combined CPU/GPU power in manual modes while keeping palm rests remarkably cool. Turbo mode is loud but delivers desktop-level sustained performance.
Equipped with dual 12V Arc Flow fans, five thick copper heatpipes, and liquid metal on both CPU and GPU. A vapor chamber covers 45% of the main motherboard elements.
The vapor chamber keeps core temps well under throttling limits. Fan noise is noticeable but remains below the 50 dBA mark in normal Turbo mode, making it one of the better-performing systems in this weight class.
| How Hard It's Running | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) Measurements | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) Measurements |
|---|---|---|
| Not Running Anything (Idle) | Processor 42°C | Graphics 40°C | Noise 0 dBA (Fans Off) | Processor 41°C | Graphics 38°C | Noise 28 dBA |
| Playing Games (Continuous) | Processor 82°C | Graphics 75°C | Noise 40 dBA | Processor 84°C | Graphics 76°C | Noise 47 dBA |
| Maximum Stress (Stress Test) | Processor 89°C | Graphics 81°C | Noise 52 dBA | Processor 91°C | Graphics 79°C | Noise 51 dBA |
| Risk of Slowdown Due to Overheating | 25% Risk | 25% Risk |
Which screen is better for media and gaming: Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) or Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)?
Screen specifications, color range, and sound design
Direct Verdict: The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022)'s IPS-level Anti-glare display screen offers a peak brightness of 300 nits Peak, while the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)'s Mini-LED IPS screen features 1100 nits Peak (HDR) brightness.
The 240Hz WQHD IPS panel is buttery smooth, making full use of the RTX 3080 Ti. Colors are punchy with 100% DCI-P3 coverage, though the 300 nits max brightness feels a bit dim in heavily sunlit rooms compared to Mini-LED alternatives.
The Mini-LED panel offers deep blacks with 1024 local dimming zones. Blooming is minimal and only visible in high-contrast HDR scenarios. G-Sync works flawlessly to eliminate tearing. A 20kHz PWM frequency is used at low brightness, which should prevent eye strain for most users.
Which laptop is more portable and has better battery life?
Weight, charger size, and real battery life
Direct Verdict: The Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) is the more portable option, weighing only 2.50 kg (5.51 lbs) and achieving up to 6.5 Hours of office browsing battery life, compared to the heavier configuration's weight limits.
Strictly a desktop replacement. At 3.0 kg for the laptop plus over 1 kg for the power brick, this is meant to travel from desk to desk, not daily commutes.
Good for desk-to-desk travel, but the heavy brick and mid-tier battery life restrict standard outdoor mobility.
Which laptop is a better value for the price: Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) or Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)?
Value calculation and price compared to speed
Direct Verdict: The Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) is the value leader, saving you $100 and achieving a superior Value Rating of 22.94 FPS per $1000 spent compared to the Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) at 22.19 FPS per $1000.
Which popular games run best on each laptop?
Game compatibility and estimated smoothness comparison
Direct Verdict: The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) supports 0 games at elite performance settings, whereas the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) handles 5 games at elite configurations out of the top 10 tested games.
| Game | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora | RECOMMENDEDRuns Super Smooth (60+ FPS) ✅ | ELITERuns Super Smooth (60+ FPS) ✅ |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | MINIMUMRuns Decently (30-50 FPS) ⚠️ | ELITERuns Super Smooth (60+ FPS) ✅ |
| Far Cry 6 | RECOMMENDEDRuns Super Smooth (60+ FPS) ✅ | ELITERuns Super Smooth (60+ FPS) ✅ |
| Grand Theft Auto V | MINIMUMRuns Decently (30-50 FPS) ⚠️ | ELITERuns Super Smooth (60+ FPS) ✅ |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | RECOMMENDEDRuns Super Smooth (60+ FPS) ✅ | ELITERuns Super Smooth (60+ FPS) ✅ |
🔗 Related Laptop Hardware Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Common questions regarding the comparison between both rigs
Which laptop is faster for high frame rate gaming, the Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) or the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)?
Testing shows that the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) is the faster laptop due to its NVIDIA RTX 5090 (Laptop) graphics processor, which generates an NKM hardware index score of 32000 points.
How do the thermal cooling solutions compare between these two systems?
The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) features an engineering build with "Custom vapor chamber covering 48.8% of the motherboard, featuring Conductonaut Extreme liquid metal on both CPU and GPU, exhausted by four 0.1mm copper fin heatsinks." and is reviewed with sustained full-stress noise levels around 52 dBA. By comparison, the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) uses "Equipped with dual 12V Arc Flow fans, five thick copper heatpipes, and liquid metal on both CPU and GPU. A vapor chamber covers 45% of the main motherboard elements." and tests at 51 dBA.
Is there a significant retail price difference between the Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) and Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)?
Yes, the Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) is listed at $3,999 compared to the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) at $3,899. This creates a price delta of $100 USD.
Which laptop has better battery capacity and daily mobility suitability?
The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) has a battery cell of 90 Watt-hours (Wh) 4-cell Li-ion providing approximately 6.5 Hours of office workloads, while the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) is built with a 90 Watt-hours (Wh) cell that runs for 6.5 Hours.
Can both laptops easily run demanding AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 and Black Myth: Wukong?
Both systems are equipped with top-tier hardware configurations. In Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p Ultra presets), the Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) delivers a stable 65 FPS, while the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) achieves 74 FPS.